By Idowu Ephraim Faleye
+2348132100608
There is a certain problem inside Nigeria’s education system that people rarely talk about. It has to do with how our society measures students’ intelligence. In Nigeria, we often mix two different things together. One is brilliance. The other is the ability to memorize and recall information. Unfortunately, we treat these two different traits as if they are the same. When a student scores high marks in an examination, people immediately conclude that the student is very brilliant. Parents celebrate. Teachers praise the student. Friends admire the result.
But one important question is rarely asked: did the student truly understand what he studied, or did he simply memorize it long enough to pass the exam? This is where the confusion begins. There is a clear difference between reading to pass an examination and reading to know something. Reading to pass an examination is very common. Many students read their textbooks with only one goal in mind: passing the exam. They memorize definitions, explanations, and formulas. Sometimes they even memorize entire pages of their notes.
When the examination begins, they simply recall what they memorized and write it down exactly as they learned it. If their memory works well, they score high marks. But something interesting often happens after the examination. Much of what they memorized disappears from their mind. Not because they are careless, but because they never truly understood the knowledge in the first place. They only stored it temporarily.
True knowledge works differently. When you read to know something, you are not trying to memorize sentences. You are trying to understand ideas. You want to know how something works and why it works that way. When someone truly understands a concept, they can explain it in their own words. They do not need to memorize every line from a textbook. Understanding itself helps memory.
Even if you wake such a person up from sleep and ask about the topic, the person can still explain it clearly. That is what real knowledge looks like. It is similar to waking someone up and asking how to prepare pounded yam. If the person has prepared pounded yam before, they will readily give a clear and vivid explanation of the process because they already understand it from experience.
Unfortunately, many parts of our education system reward memorization more than understanding. Students quickly learn what the system wants, so they adapt. They focus on past questions, likely exam topics, and memorized answers. Education then becomes an exercise in memorization instead of understanding.
This is one reason many graduates struggle to apply what they studied when they face real-life problems. You sometimes see a strange situation in Nigeria where a graduate of automobile engineering cannot fix his own car when it breaks down. That situation sounds funny, but it reveals a deeper problem. If an engineer cannot diagnose a simple mechanical problem in his own vehicle, then something is wrong with the kind of training he received. The problem is not intelligence. The problem is the way knowledge was learned.
Many students study engineering mostly through theory. They memorize formulas. They write examinations. They pass courses. They collect certificates. But they do not spend enough time understanding how machines truly work in practice. As a result, when the real machine breaks down in front of them, they struggle to solve the problem.
Meanwhile, a roadside mechanic who never attended a university may quickly identify the fault and fix it. Why? Because the roadside mechanic learned through practical experience. He has touched engines. He has dismantled parts. He has seen problems repeatedly and solved them many times. His knowledge is practical.
This example explains why many universities in Nigeria struggle to produce strong technological innovation. A university system that emphasizes memorization will mostly produce graduates who know theories but struggle with application. Technology development does not grow from memorized knowledge. It grows from practical understanding.
Countries that lead in technology train their students to build, experiment, observe, and solve real problems. When students spend more time understanding how things work, they become innovators. When they spend most of their time memorizing theories, they mostly become exam passers.
One of the best ways to see the difference between memorization and understanding is through practical learning. Let me give a simple example from my own learning experience. When I was studying technical subjects, there was a theory called Archimedes’ Principle. The theory states that *”If a body is partially or totally immersed in a fluid, the upthrust is equal to the weight of the fluid displaced”*.
As a student, I memorized the statement. If an examination question asked for it, I could reproduce it exactly. But the truth is that I did not truly understand what the theory meant. Then one day someone explained the theory to me in a practical way.
He asked me to bring a small bowl, a cup full of water, and an egg. He placed the cup of water inside the bowl. Then he asked me to gently place the egg into the cup of water. As the egg entered the cup, some of the water spilled into the bowl. He then explained what had happened. The water in the cup was the fluid. The egg was the object. The water that spilled into the bowl was the amount of water displaced by the egg. In other words, the water pushed away by the egg was equal to the space the egg occupied.
Immediately the theory made sense. It was no longer a complicated sentence to memorize. It became something I had seen with my own eyes. From that day, I never needed to memorize Archimedes’ Principle again. I understood it. Because I understood it, I could recall it anytime. Even if someone wakes me from sleep and asks me about it, I can explain it easily.
That is the power of practical learning. Once the brain sees something clearly, it remembers it naturally. The knowledge becomes permanent. This is the kind of learning that should happen more often in classrooms.
But many classrooms still rely mainly on theory. Students copy notes. Teachers dictate explanations. Students memorize the notes. Then examinations come. After the exam, much of the information disappears. But imagine if learning becomes more practical and visual. Imagine if students see how things work instead of only hearing about them. One simple way to make this possible is through visual learning with projectors and educational videos in classrooms.
If professionals record clear demonstrations of different topics, those videos can be shown in classrooms across the country. A teacher walks into the classroom, switches on the projector, and plays the video. Students watch the concept being demonstrated. They see the process step by step. They see real-life examples. Understanding becomes easier.
In fact, we already know this method works. Look at how children watch entertainment films. Children can watch a Hollywood movie once and later narrate almost every scene in the film. They remember the characters, the events, and even specific conversations. Nobody asked them to memorize the movie. They remember it because they saw it.
Visual learning is powerful. The same principle can apply to education. If students watch a clear visual explanation of a scientific concept, a mechanical process, or a historical event, the information becomes easier to understand and remember. After watching, the teacher can then explain further, answer questions, and guide discussion. This combination of visual learning and teacher guidance can transform the classroom.
Students will understand more. They will remember more. Most importantly, they will be able to apply what they learn. Once learning becomes practical, students will stop reading only to pass exams. They will begin to read to understand.
And when students understand what they study, examinations themselves become easier. They do not struggle to recall memorized sentences. They simply explain what they know.
Nigeria has many intelligent young people. The problem has never been lack of intelligence. The real challenge is a learning culture that places too much emphasis on memorization. If education shifts toward understanding and practical learning, the difference will be clear. Students will become curious. They will ask questions. They will experiment. They will want to understand how things work. That curiosity is what drives innovation.
And once innovation begins to grow, the gap in technology development will begin to close. At that point, brilliance will no longer be confused with memorization. Instead, brilliance will be recognized for what it truly is: the ability to understand, think, and apply knowledge to solve real problems.
*@ 2026 EphraimHill DataBlog. Idowu Ephraim Faleye is a freelance writer promoting good governance and public service delivery. +2348132100608*
Leave a comment