Monday, 14 May 2012 00:23

On Obama’s Public Endorsement Of Homosexuality

Written by 

On Wednesday, May 10, 2012, the President of the United States of America publicly declared his support for homosexual life style.

As far as law is concerned, his declaration makes no difference for only Congress can make laws that change the legal status of those who practice sodomy.  Nevertheless, Mr. Obama’s endorsement of this deviant lifestyle adds a certain degree of approval for it.

Gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender folk are jubilant. They are now salivating for the day that Congress passes law approving their life style. Thereafter, they would embark on a new campaign to have the law changed so that they not only have sex with persons of the same gender but with children (the North American Man-Boy Association, a homosexual lobby, wants men to have sex with children as young as six years old!).

As they see it, there is absolutely nothing wrong with their behavior; to them all behavior is natural. As they see it, in nature all behavior is permitted; it is society that limits behavior and they construe themselves as on a mission to remove social restrictions and giving people their natural freedom to do as they please.

Mark this down: a few years after Congress legalizes their life style, homosexuals will launch a battle to legitimize man- boy sex and eventually man-animal sex.  These people are embarked on a radical mission to change society, to throw away all traditional values and replace them with their own constructs of how society ought to operate.

As they see it, Laws are social constructs so why not deconstruct them and replace them with new reconstructed laws, ones that permit whatever the human imagination can conceptualize?

They tell us that in ancient Greece and Rome sex between adult men and boys was allowed and that it was only the advent of Christianity that banned that life style. Throw away the values of Christianity and replace them with the “natural values” of pagan Greece and Rome, they preach.

(And we know what happened to amoral Greece and Rome; effeminate Greece and Rome fell and were replaced by more vigorous peoples; such is probably the future of homosexual legalizing decadent western civilization; they will be replaced by self-restraining vigorous barbarians.)

What shall we make of this Barack Obama guy?  He does not do what needs to be done; he does mostly what is absurd.  No one would say that he understands how to solve what ails the American economy.  Worse, he seems not to care.  He seems to be so narcissistic that getting attention from folks and admiring his shadows in the mirror is all that matters to him. The man practically exists to make speeches from which he obtains public applause but sit tight in the White House, invite leaders of Congress  in and work with them, twist arms if necessary, to get things done for Americans he would not do.

That over 20% of black folks are unemployed (black folks who like sheep voted for him) does not bother him.  He has not initiated any program that specifically addressed black folk’s issues.

More than half of black kids do not graduate from secondary school; most of them do not even know how to read or write; in fact, many of them cannot fill out job application forms.

Many black youth exist to go in and out of jails and prisons (one out of every four black youth under age 24 is either in jail or is supervised by white parole and probation officers). Brother Obama seems not concerned by black folk’s issues.

The man is completely oblivious of Africa's issues; surely, he has not done as nearly as his predecessor, George Bush, for Africa! One would expect a black president to do more than a white president for Africa; he is quite an interesting man!

Nor is he really concerned about what needs to be done to jumpstart the economy.  The man simply muddles through.

Yet the chances are that most black folks, including me, would vote for him. Why not? They are proud to have a black man in the White House and that trumps whether he is doing a good job or not.

I hate discrimination.  I believe that all people should be treated the same. In the employment world I believe that the employer should hire people solely because they can do the job, regardless of their race, gender or sexual orientation. I do not think that an employer should ask any questions that are not related to the performance of the job.  Thus, I am opposed to discrimination against gay folks.

That been said, I suspect that there is something wrong with men who claim to derive pleasure from sticking their penises into other men’s mouths and anuses.  In my judgment, these people have a sickness; what that sickness is I do not quite understand.

I have worked with homosexual folk and know that whatever is their sickness it does not affect the quality of their work performance. They do their work as well as other folks. Therefore, no one should discriminate against them in the job place. Yet, something tells me that these people have a problem.

I do not think that we should routinize problems and normalize pathologies. I know that no one has healed homosexuals of their peculiar sexuality; still, I think that they have a problem, what it is I do not know!

Psychotherapists who attempt to heal them quickly give up for they do not see anything wrong with their behavior; in fact, many of them claim that they are the more natural in behavior than heterosexuals and want to convert folks to their life style. As far as I know, no known form of psychotherapy makes these people change their sexual behavior.

Since there is no known cure for this life style, it would seem that the right thing to do is trying finding a cure for it rather than legalizing it?

(We live in the age of psychotherapy; pathological and sociopathic behaviors are now deemed matters for psychotherapists to heal; in the past these people’s behaviors would have been considered evil and or a function of possession by demons thus a matter for priests to heal them. Perhaps we need to return to the idea of evil and seek ways to reduce evil rather than condone it?)

I think that Barack Obama made a mistake in lending his approval to homosexuals’ bestial life style. I think that he is part of the forces working towards the collapse of Christian civilization. I think that he is working for a society where every behavior is accepted.

In Obama’s kind of society every behavior is accepted as okay; in such a society civilization as we currently know it ends and barbarism starts. I think that Obama is hastening us to barbarism.

I do not think that he knows what he is doing (does he know what he is doing in any department?).  I am supposing that given the likes of Obama in power we have no choice but to look forward to the day nihilists would destroy civilization and its restraints and replace them with their every behavior goes philosophy.

It may well be necessary for civilization to collapse and subsequent insecurity (as people return to what Thomas Hobbes called the state of nature where life is nasty, brutish and short) compels folks to initiate stringent laws that punished deviant behaviors.

Perhaps, it is necessary for society to collapse and chaos ensues so that men would return to a moral civilization?

Human beings have oppositional defiant nature; they oppose whatever is (the world, as Christianity tells us, probably came into being because we rebelled against God). If you ask them not to do anything they will do it. If heterosexual behavior is the norm some people will oppose it.

This spirit of oppositionality is probably what causes homosexuality?

Now, society wants to approve adolescent opposition defiant disorder (a child mental state that does not accept the need for restrictive laws).

As long as we are walking down that path, we have to legalize anti-social behavior. Why not?

Consider Nigeria. Most people there are already thieves so why not normalize being a thief; why complain about what is already the norm?

Applying homosexual type logic to so-called anti-social behaviors, one may ask: who says that not stealing is appropriate behavior?

Pro-social behavior is a social construct, not natural phenomenon; society defines what criminal behavior is; nature does not judge any behavior unnatural and criminal.

In nature animals do take what does not belong to them; hungry cattle eats grass wherever it sees grass regardless of who claims to own the grass.

In fact, it is private property that is man-made, unnatural institution!  You get my point. Soon, what is currently called abnormal behavior would be seen as normal behavior.

When that happens, we shall then see where the world according to Obama leads us. In the meantime, one is not going to sweat Obama’s world for it too shall come to pass.

Nothing in existence is permanent; change is the only predictable aspect of our existence.  The world according to Obama is not going to be permanent. One will sit out these social engineers destroying what took thousands of years to construct, what has served us well and replacing them with hedonistic need to stimulate the human body and in doing so trying to stimulate people out of their existential depression.

To be human is to be aware of our dreadful situation. We are born and will die. We therefore feel mildly depressed. We try to escape from that existential depression through drugs, sex and pleasure.

Homosexuals try to escape from their existential depression by incessantly stimulating their bodies through sex. Sooner or later, they would learn that what gives people joy and peace of mind is acceptance of some kind of belief in life after death and in spirit.

Religion and philosophy is the consolation of man, not the pursuit of somatic sensations induced by frequent sex (addiction to sex, drugs and pleasure in general).

*These days anyone who dares state his disapproval of homosexuality is accused of homophobia. I am not afraid of homosexual folks.  I get along with them; some of my best friends are homosexuals. It just so happens that their sexual conduct is repulsive to me.  This is not because one is driven by fear of not doing what God would punish. I could care less for a God that punishes people rather than love them.  It is just the case that what homosexual men do makes me sick and I would rather they did not do it. I have also learned that other people do not exist to obey my wishes, so I let them be.  But if you ask me, I do not think that we should legalize homosexual behavior. Let them do their thing in closets, as they probably have done throughout human civilization. There are always those who oppose what is and they probably will always exist but we do not have to give their oppositional behavior legal approval.  I know that political correctness disapproves of my position but there you have it, make of it what you like.

Read 3682 times
Ozodi Osuji Ph.D

Ozodi Thomas Osuji is from Imo State, Nigeria. He obtained his PhD from UCLA. He taught at a couple of Universities and decided to go back to school and study psychology. Thereafter, he worked in the mental health field and was the Executive Director of two mental health agencies. He subsequently left the mental health environment with the goal of being less influenced by others perspectives, so as to be able to think for himself and synthesize Western, Asian and African perspectives on phenomena. Dr Osuji’s goal is to provide us with a unique perspective, one that is not strictly Western or African but a synthesis of both. Dr Osuji teaches, writes and consults on leadership, management, politics, psychology and religions. Dr Osuji is married and has three children; he lives at Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

He can be reached at: ozodiosuji@gmail.com (907) 310-8176