Monday, 18 July 2016 21:53

Europe's response to ISIS shows that she is weak

Written by 

I have been watching Europe's response to ISIS' terrorism in Europe. Each time ISIS terrorists killed people in Europe I expected Europeans to take action to end ISIS' terrorism.

We know what it will take to end ISIS' terrorism: amass an army and go to Raqqa and destroy ISIS' headquarters and reclaim other parts of Iraq and Syria occupied by ISIS and stay there and make sure that ISIS does not have territory and then launch an ideological war against Islam.

Islam has a long term goal of transforming the entire world into an Islamic caliphate ruled from Mecca. Islam has many passages in its holy book, the Koran asking Muslims to kill non-Muslims and do whatever they can do to make the world an Islamic world. This goal is crystal clear.

Europeans need to take on the Islamic challenge and fight it, show the world that Islam is a missionary religion bent on converting the entire world by violence to Islam.

If the West is a lover of freedom it has to get rid of the Islamic menace to the world's civil liberties.  But instead of doing these things Europeans keep quiet. Islamic terrorists kill Europeans in Paris, Nice (France), Brussels, Madrid, London and elsewhere and Europeans keep quiet and do nothing.

Europeans' do nothing attitude to Islamic terrorism has led me to reevaluate my prior perception of them as a warrior people.

For some reasons I had the impression that if Muslims killed Europeans that Europeans would take the war to Muslims to defend their people.

Apparently, Europe does not have the will or ability to take the war to the Muslim enemy. This tells me that Europeans are not the masters of the universe that they had presented themselves as. It means that they can be easily defeated by Africans.

And make no mistake about it: Europe and Africa has a date with destiny. Europeans enslaved Africans and colonized Africans and treated Africans like feces. In the nature of things those who were treated in the manner that Africans were treated generally do not forgive and forget it, they seek revenge. Thus, sooner or later Europe and Africa must have a show down; their rendezvous with fate is already written in stone.

It may not be soon but in the next few hundred years' wrongs will be righted. When those wrongs are being righted Europeans would not be the formidable opponents that I had expected them to be.  Africa can easily defeat Europe.

As I ponder Europe's gutless response to ISIS, I often wonder how Europeans managed to colonize Africans. If Europeans are this weak how did they manage to colonize Africans?

Clearly, Africans were not all cowards.  I know that my Igbo ancestors were a warrior people so how did weak Europeans conquer them and imposed their rule on them?

It was because Africans were technologically backward. They did not have the technical means to defend themselves and therefore a European with machine guns easily waltzed through their world and defeated them. It was advanced guns that defeated Africans, not European courage.

This means that Africans must hurry up and become technologically developed; if they do I doubt that Europeans would be a match for them in the battlefield.

Modernize and industrialize Africa; manufacture military weapons in Africa and then take on Europe. That is all there is to it, really. All else is talking and no problem is solved by mere talk.

The corruption that currently characterizes Africa can be swept aside if real leaders arise in Africa, gather corrupt politicians and shoot them to death. It does not matter if millions are shot what matters are killing anyone who has ever taken bribery and or stolen public funds. That must be done to teach Africans not to see public funds as their private monies.

If thousands, even millions of Nigerians are lined up and used for target practice I believe that the rest of them would shape up, real quick and stop being such despicable and contemptible thieves.

The will to fight and die appears to have gone south in Europe; this means that all kinds of people with the will to fight and die can take on Europeans and defeat them in the battle field.

White Americans still have the will to fight and die hence can still make formidable soldiers. But with the approval of homosexuals in the US military there is no doubt that the military will soon become sissified and lose the will to fight and die; narcissistic homosexuals are mostly invested in stimulating their bodies not in fighting for causes higher than their bodies.

Africa's first order of Business is Europe; America is a long range goal; in the long term Africa will confront America for enslaving its people; perhaps, that is still a couple hundred years from now.

Actually, Africans will first deal with Arabs for it was they who began enslaving Africans before Americans got into the act.

Moreover, Africans must discard the religion of violence called Islam. Islam is an Arab religion, not Africans religion.

In conclusion, Europe's effeminate response to ISIS' terrorism informs us that Europeans are not the mighty fighting machines we had thought that there were. They are weak and, as such, can be taken on and eventually forced to make amends for colonializing Africa.

There is no use talking about the sins of colonialism; what matters is forcing the colonizers to pay a severe price for their sins in the battle field.

It is only when Africans defeat Europeans in the battle field would their sense of manhood be restored; mere talk will not remove the sense of impotence  found in Africans; when you defeat your enemy at war you see yourself as a man but before that you see yourself as a child.

At present, Africans, in their relationship with Europeans, feel like powerless children.

Europeans humiliated Africans by colonizing them; sooner or later, that humiliation of Africans must be avenged, preferably in the battle field.

Ozodi Osuji

July 18, 2016

Read 372 times
Ozodi Osuji Ph.D

Ozodi Thomas Osuji is from Imo State, Nigeria. He obtained his PhD from UCLA. He taught at a couple of Universities and decided to go back to school and study psychology. Thereafter, he worked in the mental health field and was the Executive Director of two mental health agencies. He subsequently left the mental health environment with the goal of being less influenced by others perspectives, so as to be able to think for himself and synthesize Western, Asian and African perspectives on phenomena. Dr Osuji’s goal is to provide us with a unique perspective, one that is not strictly Western or African but a synthesis of both. Dr Osuji teaches, writes and consults on leadership, management, politics, psychology and religions. Dr Osuji is married and has three children; he lives at Anchorage, Alaska, USA.

He can be reached at: (907) 310-8176